@article{Rizqi Yoga Pratama_Ria Setyawati_2020, title={ANTICOMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR IN EARLY PARENT STOCK SORTING}, volume={17}, url={https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/934}, DOI={10.48080/jae.v17i3.934}, abstractNote={<p>The indication of anticompetitive behavior that carried out by several large companies in the<br>poultry industry has become an obstacle for other business actors that do not have power to<br>entry the market. The regulation relates to the poultry industry has been regulated, one of which<br>is in the Law Number 18 of 2010 concerning Agriculture and Animal Health. In addition, the<br>Ministry of Agriculture Circular Letter Number 15043/FK.010/F/10/2015 is also closely<br>related to the regulation implementing by large poultry breeding business actor. Although,<br>these regulations have been issued, the indication of anticompetitive behavior still takes place.<br>Therefore, this study reviews the regulations that have been established. This study aims to<br>review the indication of anticompetitive behavior in the early parent stock sorting by breeding<br>company. Besides that, this study also aims to review the regulation related to the adjustment<br>of the parent stock population and its conformity with the direction of business legal policy.<br>Government policy through the Ministry of Agriculture Circular Letter No.<br>15043/FK.010/F/10/2015 concerning the adjustment of the parent stock population<br>unintentionally limits the movement of local business actor to get parent stock with low prices.<br>The existence of the Ministry of Health letter becomes a policy gap that is pro-anticompetitive<br>to be used by large poultry breeding company and is indicated to be contradicted with the<br>direction of business competition law in accordance with the principles of economic<br>democracy</p>}, number={3}, journal={PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology}, author={Rizqi Yoga Pratama and Ria Setyawati}, year={2020}, month={Dec.}, pages={1909-1917} }