JACK SYMONDS’ SPEECH IN OXFORD UNION DEBATE: A PRAGMATIC STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION

Abstract

In argumentations or events such as Oxford Union Debates, speakers are expected to present the best data, in terms of content and linguistic realization, on the topic of discussion to effect on both the audience and the opposing party. As such, these events do not only leave impacts on the social levels (by contributing in lessening tension on controversial issues) but also on the linguistic levels. Speeches from these events present wealth of data on language use during argumentations and on rhetoric as well. Therefore, the current study seeks to analyze and discuss the different linguistic means (both techniques and principles) employed by Jack to make his series of arguments creatively reasonable and effective and help his party win the debate. That is, the linguistic means to achieve a reasonable and effective argumentation are investigated.