SUPPORTED ARGUMENTATION IN HASANI DISCOURSE AN EXPLORATORY READING ON THE PERSUASIVE DELIBERATIVE DIMENSIONS

Abstract

The linguistic dimensions of the argumentation have been demonstrated by making use of the Argumentation ’methods, whose patterns and origins were derived from the Qur’anic discourse, and it was represented by the process of the Hasani discourse by arguing of his guardians convincingly and his enemies in a deterrent and a hindrance. So we see him present their opinions and argue with them by appealing to Qur’anic concepts as a collective starting point and tagged with a certain agreement in the axioms of the dialogue. Thus, it carries an influential dimension in the addressee and changes his cognitive structure towards Quranic intent that represented achievement actions with a directive or dialectical dimension. These are paths that support the discourse and it strengthens its purposes by revealing its knowledge buildings especially (Quranic buildings) which constituted the "supported argumentation"; Because the Hasani discourse (peace be upon him) included in its folds many Qur’an texts with argumentative concepts that narrate positions, and tell us events that have interdisciplinary dimensions necessitated by the link between the two texts in the argumentative epistemological dimension. This type of use and interactions of texts reflects the characteristics of the Hasani discourse, and establishes its purposes, as a discourse with "argumentative" features; Because it did not deviate from the activities that the Qur’anic discourse occupied in the realm of concepts and ratifications. In addition, it memorizes the qualities and characteristics of the people being addressed. Because the Quranic discourse is present in them. In that, there is a kind of "reinforced" protest against non-Qur’anic concepts that are the daily life behavior of the people. This link between concepts with their opposite

movement justifies the anecdotal performance of Imam al-Hassan (peace be upon him), which is based on Qur’anic concepts in support of arguments and the outcome of the results that form units supporting the movement of the Hajj discourse. This link between concepts and their opposite movement justifies the anthropomorphic performance of Imam al-Hassan (peace be upon him), which is based on Qur’anic concepts in support of arguments and the outcome of the results that form units supporting the movement of the argumentative discourse.