RULINGS ON MUTANTS AND WHAT IS LIKE THEM IN IMAMI JURISPRUDENCE

Abstract

The importance of jurisprudential research in the practical life of Muslims is non questionable; Because it is based on a statement of the legal ruling on the one hand, and a statement of the practical function of the Mukallaf (Mature Muslim) on the other hand, according to the necessity of the existence of evidence. Among the jurisprudential studies related to the life of a person and what is related to securing his happiness in the Worlds was related to the research of (mutants) and the explanation of their images and rulings in Islamic jurisprudence in general, and in Imami jurisprudence in particular because of the legal texts mentioned this containing the verses and the noble narrations on the authority of the Prophet (’) and the imams from his family (^), and the research will inform us about that, both in confirmation and denial; After we clarify what is meant by the mutants in the linguistic meaning and the legal terminology for it, and then clarify the validations and images of the mutants and the legal rulings related to them. It has become clear to us through this study that the mutants are in multiple forms. And with the ruling that most of them are purity, but it does not fall under the ritual slaughter, which is a condition of the permissibility of eating meat of the slaughtered. Hence the sayings and fatwas of the Imami jurists agreed on the prohibition of eating its meat, according to the clear and conclusive Sharia evidence that it was not observed on the one hand, and that it is not permissible to eat it on the other hand. However, they did not agree to specify what is impure and what is pure. Because this was not a point of agreement and consensus among them, but rather they differed according to the difference in evidence and understanding of the related text, and this will be clearified by reading this special study.