THE CONTROVERSY OF FORMAL DIFFERENCE IN PICASSO'S ASSEMBLAGE SCULPTURES

Authors

  • Aqeel Yousof Aledany , Prof Maher Kamel Alnasery

Abstract

This research is concerned with studying the dialectic of formal difference in (Picasso) assembly’s sculptures, and it falls into four chapters, which included a statement of the research problem, its importance, goal and limits, in addition to defining the terms contained therein. A distinctive model in showing the difference in terms of form and content, in addition to the structure and its presence in the works of (Picasso) assemblies, which relied on scientific and philosophical theories to keep pace with the transformations and differences in which these works move from one stage to another. The importance of the research lies in the possibility of observing the dialectic of the formal difference in Picasso’s assemblage works at the level of differentiation in form or idea through the different presentation of the artistic achievement, especially in the modern period, from the year (1914 - 1942 AD). It included the theoretical framework about the first topic by studying the dialectic of intellectual difference, while the second topic was represented by the difference in form in the works of the artist (Pablo Picasso), and it included research procedures, while the fourth chapter included the results and conclusions.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-27

How to Cite

Aqeel Yousof Aledany , Prof Maher Kamel Alnasery. (2021). THE CONTROVERSY OF FORMAL DIFFERENCE IN PICASSO’S ASSEMBLAGE SCULPTURES. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 18(08), 2310-2327. Retrieved from https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/9109