Response to Vandecruys (2006). The Sphinx: Dramatising Data….and Dating. – PalArch, Series Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 1, 1: 1–13

Authors

  • colin.reader@btinternet.com CGeol FGS 54 Rigby Road, Maghull, Merseyside, L31 8AZ,

Abstract

In a previous paper (Vandecruys, 2006), the evidence presented by the current author for redating the Sphinx of Giza and a number of other structures present within the Giza necropolis has been reassessed. Following this reassessment, Vandecruys has raised a number of objections to the current authors thesis. The current paper provides a response to the criticism of Vandecruys and presents further arguments in support of Early Dynastic development at Giza, of which the Sphinx is considered to have formed an important element

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-30

How to Cite

Reader, C. . (2020). PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 3(1), 01–13. Retrieved from https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/660